This case of the Supreme Court concerned a land with 53 acres in Survey No. 83/2, Raidurg Panmaktha, Telangana. Originally owned as 526.07 acre land by 11 people, the land was taken through the Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms Act, 1976 whereby 99.07 acres were taken by the State and 424.13 acres subsequently transferred to the APIIC (now mother of TSIIC). An earlier sale agreement went between the owners and Bhavana Co-operative Housing Society, which was sold off in 1982 and which became valid in 2006 and later declared as a fraud in 2015. The Court ruled that it is not possible that sale agreements, which are not registered, can transfer title and real physical possession has to be established. It observed inconsistencies in versions of agreement, consideration and extent of land and held that the title was suspect. Using Suraj Lamp and Balkrishna Dattatraya decisions the Court proceeded to uphold that transfer of immovable property requires registration of conveyance deeds only. It upheld the rejection of the writ by the Single Judge on the ground that the title and possession was not legally established.