In Saneesh Soman v. Narcotics Control Bureau, the Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner, arrested for allegedly collecting a parcel containing 100 LSD blots (3.5 grams). The Court noted that conscious possession under the NDPS Act requires both knowledge and control over contraband, which the prosecution failed to establish. The petitioner consistently claimed ignorance, stating he was collecting the parcel for a neighbor. The Court found no corroborative evidence like call records, financial links, or digital communications tying him to the drug network. Additionally, the phone number used to track the parcel belonged to the DTDC office, not the petitioner. The Court emphasized that a Section 67 confession without corroboration has limited evidentiary value. Considering the petitioner’s clean record, cooperative conduct, and over two years in custody, the Court held that both bail conditions under Section 37(1)(b) NDPS Act were met and granted bail with strict terms, including a ₹25,000 bond, appearance compliance, and no evidence tampering.