KRB Enterprises and others, engaged in the trade of rice and coffee, were sued by KRBL Limited, a reputed rice company operating since 2000, for alleged trademark infringement. KRBL claimed that the mark "KRB KREB" used by KRB Enterprises was deceptively similar to its registered trademark "KRBL LIMITED," which includes a diamond-shaped paddy device. KRBL asserted prior use, registration, and international recognition. KRB Enterprises defended the use of "KRB" as an honest adoption derived from family initials and contended that KRBL had not used the mark directly on goods. The Commercial Court granted an interim injunction, restraining KRB Enterprises from using "KRB" or any similar mark. On appeal, the Delhi High Court upheld the injunction, citing deceptive similarity between the marks, KRBL’s established rights and continuous use, and the absence of acquiescence or abandonment by KRBL.