The Supreme Court of India considered compliance with its earlier directions in State of Uttar Pradesh v. Ajmal Beg concerning prosecution of dowry death and cruelty cases. The case involved allegations that a married woman had suffered repeated demands for a colour television, motorcycle or scooter and ₹15,000 in cash, followed by her death in a burning incident. The accused had originally been convicted under Section 304-B IPC, Section 498-A IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, but the High Court acquitted them. The Supreme Court examined the implementation of safeguards intended to ensure effective investigation and trial of such cases. The Court stressed the importance of prompt framing of charges, avoiding unnecessary adjournments, proper investigation and monitoring of serious dowry-related offences. The matter illustrates the statutory requirements of dowry death, cruelty, “soon before death,” Section 304-B IPC, Section 498-A IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act.