In State of Tamil Nadu v. Junglee Games India Pvt. Ltd., the Supreme Court held that while games of skill such as rummy, poker, and fantasy sports may enjoy constitutional protection, betting or wagering on such games does not. Upholding laws enacted by Tamil Nadu and Karnataka, the Court ruled that States have the constitutional authority under Entry 34 of the State List to regulate or prohibit betting and gambling, including online wagering platforms. The Court drew a clear distinction between playing a skill-based game and staking money on its outcome. It observed that betting remains a separate activity regardless of whether the underlying game involves skill or chance. Once monetary wagering is involved, concerns such as addiction, financial distress, and public welfare arise. The Court further held that betting and gambling are res extra commercium—activities outside the sphere of protected trade and commerce. Consequently, online gaming companies cannot claim protection under Article 19(1)(g) to conduct betting businesses. The judgment validates State regulation of online betting platforms in the interest of public order and welfare.