In Kaushal Singh v. The State of Rajasthan, decided on July 18, 2025, the Supreme Court addressed the issue of judicial propriety and procedural fairness concerning a District Judge criticized by the Rajasthan High Court for granting bail in a serious criminal case. The High Court had passed personal strictures against the judge, alleging procedural lapses and misapplication of law, and forwarded the matter for disciplinary action. The Supreme Court expunged these remarks, emphasizing that High Courts should avoid making personal observations against judicial officers in their judgments. Instead, any concerns regarding judicial conduct should be raised confidentially with the Chief Justice, allowing the officer an opportunity to respond. Public criticism without hearing violates natural justice, harms reputations, undermines authority, and demoralizes the judiciary. Additionally, the Court directed all High Courts to consider framing rules mandating disclosure of criminal antecedents and prior bail applications by accused persons, ensuring transparency and consistency in bail decisions.