A bench of Judges MM Sundresh and Aravind Kumar inquired the Officer to take a new call on the issuance of summons after analyzing the article in address. The Preeminent Court on Wednesday set aside a Delhi high Court decision that had suppressed the summons issued to online news entrance The Wire in association with a criticism case recorded by a teacher at the Jawaharlal Nehru College (JNU) [Amita Singh v. The Wire through its Editor Siddharth Bhatia and anr] The Wire's news report had affirmed that Teacher Amita Singh was at the steerage of a bunch of JNU instructors who had compiled a 200-page file naming JNU a "cave of sorted out sex racket" A bench of Judges MM Sundresh and Aravind Kumar inquired the Officer to take a new call on the issuance of summons after looking at the article distributed by The Wire. "We are of the see that the High Court has certainly surpassed its locale. We have no faltering in setting aside the decried judgment. We discover that both the high Court and the Judge have blundered. Suffice to say that the officer has not looked at the genuine distribution; law does not disallow him from doing the same some time recently issuing summons", it ordered. The Officer was given the freedom to continue with the matter over again without considering any of the perceptions made by the high Court prior. The Incomparable Court had in July final year looked for the reaction of The Wire and the Jawaharlal Nehru College (JNU) in the moment case relating to criminal criticism procedures against the entrance by the JNU teacher. The Seat had, at the time, indeed orally commented that it was difficult to see how a case of maligning was made out. The appealing party, Teacher Amita Singh of JNU's Middle for Law & Administration, challenged a Delhi high Court arrange from Walk that had suppressed the summons issued by a judge court.