A mother filed a writ petition seeking termination of her 17-year-old daughter's 22-week pregnancy, allegedly caused by rape. However, the minor opposed the abortion, stating the relationship was consensual and she wished to keep the child. The Rajasthan High Court held that reproductive autonomy, even for mature minors, is protected under Article 21. It ruled that when a pregnant minor is found capable of understanding the consequences, her decision prevails over her guardian's. The Court dismissed the petition, directed the State to bear medical expenses and provide compensation under the Rajasthan Victim Compensation Scheme, affirming the primacy of bodily autonomy.