The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of Chetan for the murder of Vikram Shinde, relying on strong circumstantial evidence. Though the alleged motive a monetary dispute was not conclusively proven, the Court noted that motive is not essential when the chain of circumstantial evidence is complete. Key evidence included the “last seen together” theory, recovery of the murder weapon (a double-barrel gun belonging to Chetan’s grandfather), and ballistic reports confirming it fired the fatal shot. Forensic examination matched pellets and wads found in the victim’s skull with the recovered gun. Additionally, a gold chain belonging to the deceased was found in Chetan’s possession. The Court noted that Chetan’s absconding and false statements amounted to relevant conduct under Section 8 of the Evidence Act, though not conclusive proof of guilt. Despite a 3-day gap between the last sighting and recovery of the body, forensic evidence bridged the timeline. The Court upheld convictions under Sections 302 and 404 IPC, granting limited relief regarding a recovered mobile phone.